Astellic
← Astellic in Action
Evidence

Evaluation that changes decisions, not just closes projects.

Four evaluations where the method was chosen to fit the decision.

MalawiZambiaMulti-country

A comparison set — the question, the design, the decision it informed.
Founder experience · Independent evaluation consultancies · 2022–2025

The question

Did integrated AGYW services improve access?

The design

Baseline → endline + Scorecard

Mangochi

The question

Is cervical-cancer screening reaching women?

The design

Midline: KIIs, FGDs, surveys

Sondra Smalley

The question

What should the next youth strategy be?

The design

4-country theory-based, 32 KIIs

Commuters for Health

The question

Do community health committees work?

The design

Governance + access review

Zambia

Four evaluations — each method chosen to fit the decision.

The problem

Most evaluations arrive late and answer the wrong question — built around donor reporting rather than the decision a client actually faces.

Why it was hard

Different decisions need different designs, often under data and time constraints and real political sensitivity. The craft is matching method to question.

The approach

  • 1

    AGYW HIV/SRH integration, Mangochi (World Education) — baseline then endline; redesigned and validated the Ministry of Health Youth-Friendly Health Services Scorecard; assessed referral systems, access, service quality and partner coordination.

  • 2

    Sondra Smalley midline (mothers2mothers) — policy and health-systems analysis for cervical-cancer screening; key-informant interviews, focus groups and surveys with Mentor Mothers.

  • 3

    Commuters for Health endline (Health Equity Access) — a four-country, theory-based mixed-method evaluation with 32 key-informant interviews, shaping the next youth-engagement strategy.

  • 4

    Community health systems effectiveness (On Call Africa, Zambia) — governance of Neighbourhood Health Committees and access to services.

What was created

The redesigned Youth-Friendly Health Services Scorecard

Theory-based evaluation designs and Theories of Change

Evaluation reports with prioritised, decision-ready recommendations

What changed

Findings fed programme-expansion and youth-strategy decisions for the commissioning organisations.

Frameworks & methods

Theory-based evaluationTheory of ChangeYouth-Friendly Health Services ScorecardImplementation fidelity assessment

What this demonstrates

Evaluation designMixed methodsTool developmentPolicy-relevant synthesis

Commissioning an evaluation that must inform a real decision?

Discuss a challenge